tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5808405902469395488.post3958173310351254770..comments2013-08-01T22:31:40.617-07:00Comments on DM-EDEM630: Scenario Planning Can't Predict the Future, So What's the Point?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14843602063199609755noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5808405902469395488.post-25166012779077560992013-07-31T17:28:30.466-07:002013-07-31T17:28:30.466-07:00Excellent point and good reflection!
So in theor...Excellent point and good reflection! <br /><br />So in theory if we can prepare for a few plausible scenarios (on the assumption that we can't accurately predict the future) we have a better chance that our preparations (current decisions) will provide a better fit for multiple futures. Wayne Mackintoshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15576811915197754933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5808405902469395488.post-13503406549885340792013-07-31T17:17:54.108-07:002013-07-31T17:17:54.108-07:00I like your point about reactive decisions. Christ...I like your point about reactive decisions. Christchurch would be a strong example for this. A lot of reactive decisions were (and still continue) to be made. Given our governments 3 yr cycle of elections- how many of their decisions could be considered reactive? If we could see inside John Keys office would his scenario planning be for NZ or for the National party? (the same question could be asked of the other parties too). Do they plan for us, the citizens, or for their parties future? I enjoyed reading your post by the way.Class seven teacherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04203578130651140388noreply@blogger.com